%0 Journal article
%A Zechlau, Sabrina
%A Schlund, Manuel
%A Cox, Peter M.
%A Friedlingstein, Pierre
%A Eyring, Veronika
%T Do Emergent Constraints on Carbon Cycle Feedbacks Hold in CMIP6?
%R 10.1029/2022JG006985
%J Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
%V 127
%N 12

%I 
%X Emergent constraints on carbon cycle feedbacks in response to warming and increasing atmospheric CO<sub>2 </sub> concentration have previously been identified in Earth system models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) Phase 5. Here, we examine whether two of these emergent constraints also hold for CMIP6. The spread of the sensitivity of tropical land carbon uptake to tropical warming in an idealized simulation with a 1% per year increase of atmospheric CO<sub>2 </sub> shows only a slight decrease in CMIP6 (−52 ± 35 GtC/K) compared to CMIP5 (−49 ± 40 GtC/K). For both model generations, the observed interannual variability in the growth rate of atmospheric CO<sub>2 </sub> yields a consistent emergent constraint on the sensitivity of tropical land carbon uptake with a constrained range of −37 ± 14 GtC/K for the combined ensemble (i.e., a reduction of ∼30% in the best estimate and 60% in the uncertainty range relative to the multimodel mean of the combined ensemble). A further emergent constraint is based on a relationship between CO<sub>2 </sub> fertilization and the historical increase in the CO<sub>2 </sub> seasonal cycle amplitude in high latitudes. However, this emergent constraint is not evident in CMIP6. This is in part because the historical increase in the amplitude of the CO<sub>2 </sub> seasonal cycle is more accurately simulated in CMIP6, such that the models are all now close to the observational constraint.
%U http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gldocs-11858/11458
%~  FID GEO-LEO e-docs