The statistics displayed are generated by the underlying DSpace-System of GEO-LEOe-docs. They are largely cleaned from automated machine access (e.g. crawlers), but don't follow standards such as COUNTER. For more information click here.

Total Visits

Views
Comparative Evaluation of Different MOF and Non‐MOF Porous Materials for SO2 Adsorption and Separation Showing the Importance of Small Pore Diameters for Low‐Pressure Uptake191

Total Visits Per Month

October 2023November 2023December 2023January 2024February 2024March 2024April 2024
Comparative Evaluation of Different MOF and Non‐MOF Porous Materials for SO2 Adsorption and Separation Showing the Importance of Small Pore Diameters for Low‐Pressure Uptake5523754

File Visits

Views
ADSU_ADSU202000285.pdf146

Top country views

Views
United States96
Ireland33
Germany18
Netherlands9
Russia6
Sweden6
France5
Czech Republic4
Vietnam3
Belgium2

Top cities views

Views
Dublin30
Ashburn25
Los Angeles23
Naaldwijk9
Strasbourg5
Des Moines4
Redwood City4
Clonee3
Fairfield3
Hanoi3