TY  - JOUR
A1  - Minoli, Sara
A1  - Müller, Christoph
A1  - Elliott, Joshua
A1  - Ruane, Alex C.
A1  - Jägermeyr, Jonas
A1  - Zabel, Florian
A1  - Dury, Marie
A1  - Folberth, Christian
A1  - François, Louis
A1  - Hank, Tobias
A1  - Jacquemin, Ingrid
A1  - Liu, Wenfeng
A1  - Olin, Stefan
A1  - Pugh, Thomas A. M.
T1  - Global Response Patterns of Major Rainfed Crops to Adaptation by Maintaining Current Growing Periods and Irrigation
Y1  - 2019-12-31
VL  - 7
IS  - 12
SP  - 1464
EP  - 1480
JF  - Earth's Future
DO  - 10.1029/2018EF001130
DO  - 10.23689/fidgeo-4406
N2  - Increasing temperature trends are expected to impact yields of major field crops by affecting various plant processes, such as phenology, growth, and evapotranspiration. However, future projections typically do not consider the effects of agronomic adaptation in farming practices. We use an ensemble of seven Global Gridded Crop Models to quantify the impacts and adaptation potential of field crops under increasing temperature up to 6 K, accounting for model uncertainty. We find that without adaptation, the dominant effect of temperature increase is to shorten the growing period and to reduce grain yields and production. We then test the potential of two agronomic measures to combat warming‐induced yield reduction: (i) use of cultivars with adjusted phenology to regain the reference growing period duration and (ii) conversion of rainfed systems to irrigated ones in order to alleviate the negative temperature effects that are mediated by crop evapotranspiration. We find that cultivar adaptation can fully compensate global production losses up to 2 K of temperature increase, with larger potentials in continental and temperate regions. Irrigation could also compensate production losses, but its potential is highest in arid regions, where irrigation expansion would be constrained by water scarcity. Moreover, we discuss that irrigation is not a true adaptation measure but rather an intensification strategy, as it equally increases production under any temperature level. In the tropics, even when introducing both adapted cultivars and irrigation, crop production declines already at moderate warming, making adaptation particularly challenging in these areas.
N2  - Plain Language Summary: Global warming affects yields of grain crops, which are at the base of human diets. We use crop models to quantify its impacts on global crop production and to assess how adaptation could compensate for the adverse effects. We find that up to 2 K of increased temperature production can be maintained at the current level by using new cultivars, selected to maintain current growing period length under warming. Irrigation, as another management strategy, is shown to have the potential to increase yields in dry regions if water is available. However, models do not indicate that irrigation reduces the crops' sensitivity to warming. We find large differences in the yield response to warming and adaptation across climatic regions. While continental and temperate regions may benefit from higher temperatures but also show sizable adaptation potentials, tropical and arid regions show largest temperature impacts and smaller adaptation potentials. After all, these two crop management options appear effective to balance the effects of moderate warming but cannot fully compensate impacts above 2 K of warming.
N2  - Key Points: Without agronomic adaptation, the dominant effect of temperature increase is to shorten growing periods and to reduce yields and production. Adaptation via cultivars that maintain current growing periods under warming can compensate global production losses up to 2 K. Irrigation would act as intensification rather than true adaptation, as it hardly affects the sensitivity of crop yields to warming.
UR  - http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gldocs-11858/8752
ER  -