TSK 11 Göttingen 2006 Hilgers et al. Fossil overpressures compart- ments? A case study from the Eifel area and some general aspects Vortrag Christoph Hilgers1 Carsten Bücker2 Janos L. Urai1 Introduction Fluid overpressures are well known from hydrocarbon exploration in many sed- imentary basins. They can reach al- most lithostatic values, and may cause the fracturing of rock. Fracturing allows the discharge of fluid overpressure, and fluid flows along a hydraulic gradient to- wards a low pressure reservoir. Differ- ent mechanisms may cause the precip- itation from the fluid, such as a fluid pressure drop, a variation of tempera- ture at the low pressure reservoir, or a different rock type inducing differ- ent Eh-pH conditions. Such precipitates in fractures are called veins, which of- ten display paleo-fluid overpressures in rocks. In this study, we present some re- sults from Devonian clastic sedimentary rocks of the Eifel area. Results are com- pared with other sedimentary basins to highlight some general aspects. Geological setting The lower Devonian rocks exposed along the shore of the Rursee water reservoir are Siegenian Upper Rurberger beds and Emsian Klerfer and Heimbacher beds to the NE. They are located on the SE-flank of the NE-plunging Variscan Venn-Anticlinorium. Both units expose shales, siltstones and sandstones de- posited in the subsiding Devonian Eifel Basin. 1 Geologie-Endogene Dynamik, RWTH- Aachen, Germany 2 Shell E&P, Houston, USA Meso- and microstructural data Two different vein sets are oriented subnormal (#1) and parallel (#2) to bedding, respectively. Both sets are filled with quartz. Vein set #1 is re- stricted to sandstone layers, and rarely continues into the enclosed shale beds. Their shape is sigmoidal on fold limbs, and their orientation in accordance with flexural slip along the bedding planes. The vein microstructure of #1 shows an elongate-blocky to fibrous mi- crostructure. Fibrous grains continue across the vein (stretched crystals) and contain solid and fluid inclusions ar- ranged parallel to the vein wall inter- face. Meso- and microstructural ob- servations indicate vein formation prior or syn-folding, veins opened in incre- mental steps (crack-seal mechanism). Vein set #2 is located at the shale- sandstone interface and can be traced for several tens of metres. It gener- ally truncates #1 and thus post-dates the bedding-normal veins. Locally, vein set #2 cuts trough the hanging-wall and is associated with small thrusts. The blocky quartz grains of vein set #2 extinct undulose and are recrystallised by grain boundary migration and sub- grain rotation. The quartz grains of the host rock, however, are elongated (over- growth, fringes and dissolution along the cleavage planes), but generally op- tically undeformed. This indicates that pressure solution was the dominant de- formation mechanism in the host rock. Modelling the subsidence of the up- per Rurberg beds using published data of burial temperatures (vitrinite re- flectance, illite crystallinity etc., e.g. von Winterfeld 1994) indicates rapid burial down to 7–8 km depth prior to the onset of Variscan compression and sub- sequent basin inversion. This accounts 1 Hilgers et al. TSK 11 Göttingen 2006 Figure 1: (a) The vein microstructure of #1 shows stretched crystals, which can laterally evolve towards an elongate-blocky microstructure grown syntaxially. b) Vein set #2 is blocky and was deformed plastically by dynamic recrystallisation. c, d) Fluid inclusion data show maximum temperatures of about 370°C for both vein sets #1 (c) and #2 (d). for the up to approx. 6.5 km thick lower Devonian sedimentary pile deposited in the Eifel Basin, and fluid overpressure generation during subsidence and the onset of Variscan compression (Fig. 2). Discussion and Conclusion Field and microstructural observations of vein sets #1 and #2 are consistent with our modelled overpressure gener- ation due to basin evolution (Fig. 2). Bedding normal veins #1 are restricted to the competent sandstone layers and formed in an already competent rock, as shown by transgranular fractures and the absence of compaction features as- sociated with vein set #1. Repeated crack-seal increments and the variation of paleo-temperatures suggest that veins were subsequently opened and re-sealed during subsidence. Stretched crystals are oriented normal to the vein wall, in- dicating extension normal to bedding. Vein formation requires tensile fractur- ing of the sandstone with the maximum principal stress oriented normal to bed- ding, which is consistent with vein for- mation during subsidence at high fluid overpressures and low differential stress. Bedding-parallel vein set #2 truncates set #1 and cuts through the hanging Figure 2: Subsidence curve of the Lower Devonian upper Rurberg beds. wall associated with small thrusts. This indicates a reorientation of the princi- pal stresses between #1 and #2. Vein set #2 is folded in accordance with the Variscan folds exposed on the shore, but parasitic folds of the veins are absent. This suggests that vein set #2 repre- sents the first compressional event asso- 2 TSK 11 Göttingen 2006 Hilgers et al. ciated with Variscan deformation. The vein system of the Eifel Basin is con- sistent with results from other sedimen- tary basins, which may also include mi- crostructural aspects. References von Winterfeld, C-H (1994) Variszische Deck- entektonik und devonische Beckengeometrie der Nordeifel — Ein quantitatives Modell. PhD Thesis, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, 319 pp. 3