Water remediation by metallic iron: Much ado about nothing – 1 As profitless as water in a sieve? 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Chicgoua Noubactep *(1,2,3) (1) Angewandte Geologie, Universität Göttingen, Goldschmidtstraße 3, D - 37077 Göttingen, Germany; (2) Kultur und Nachhaltige Entwicklung CDD e.V., Postfach 1502, D - 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (3) Comité Afro-européen - Avenue Léopold II, 41 - 5000 Namur, Belgium; 10 11 Running title: Interdisciplinary approach gone astray? Save the peer-review system. 12 13 14 15 16 17 *Correspondance address: PD Dr. Chicgoua Noubactep Geologie, Universität Göttingen, Goldschmidtstraße 3, D - 37077 Göttingen, Germany 18 19 20 e-mail: cnoubac@gwdg.de Tel. +49 551 39 33191 Fax: +49 551 399379 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Keywords: Interdisciplinary approach, Peer-review system, Permeable reactive barrier, Water treatment, Zero-valent iron. 1 Water remediation by metallic iron: Much ado about nothing - As profitless as water in a sieve? 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Chicgoua Noubactep Angewandte Geologie, Universität Göttingen, Goldschmidtstraße 3, D-37077, Göttingen, Germany. Kultur und Nachhaltige Entwicklung CDD e.V., Postfach 1502, D-37005 Göttingen, Germany. Comité Afro-européen - Avenue Léopold II, 41 - 5000 Namur, Belgium. e-mail: cnoubac@gwdg.de; Tel. +49 551 39 3191, Fax: +49 551 399379. There has been much ado about water treatment with metallic iron (Fe0) since the early 1990s. Thousands of articles, books, papers and technical reports have been written (i) describing laboratory feasibility tests, pilot plant performances and field implementations from around the world, (ii) outlining fundamental causes of failure (if applicable), and (iii) suggesting changes for more efficient Fe0 systems [1,2]. However, crucial knowledge about the operating mode of Fe0-based systems is still lacking. In other words, fundamental knowledge necessary for the proper design of more efficient Fe0 remediation systems is still largely ignored [3]. To fill this knowledge gap and exploit the huge potential of Fe0 for water treatment, it is urgent to use a scientifically-based, truly interdisciplinary approach. Such a comprehensive, holistic and inclusive approach will unify a sound community in the quest of more efficient Fe0 remediation systems. This argumentation is not new as the funding policy of several agencies is based on ‘interdisciplinary approach’. In other words, an interdisciplinary approach is already largely followed. Yet still severe crises are encountered, in particular concerning the mechanism of contaminant removal in Fe0/H2O systems or even, concerning the intrinsic nature of Fe0. Is Fe0 a stand-alone reducing agent or a parent of (adsorbing, enmeshing and) reducing agents? The discussion on the nature of Fe0 is now lasting more than 6 years [4] but is still largely profitless. It seems, there is a lack of willingness to test new ideas even though the comfortable one is obviously not efficient. 2 The technology of treating water with Fe0 was born with the spurious perception, that Fe0 is a reducing agent [5]. This illusive view would have challenged almost a 200-years-old knowledge on the electrochemical nature of aqueous corrosion [6,7] and almost 100 years expertise from intensive research on aqueous iron corrosion [8]. In 1923, Ulick Richardson Evans (1889-1980) has provided a modern understanding of the corrosion process based on the electrochemical theory. Fortunately, the pioneers of the technology have not explicitly challenged the electrochemical theory of aqueous iron corrosion. They have simply ignored it and built a self-satisfactorily ‘knowledge system’ regarding Fe 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 0 as a reducing agent. This knowledge system can not explain why chemical species without any redox properties have been quantitatively removed in Fe0/H2O systems. Moreover, for Fe0 to act as a reducing agent, electrons from the metal body should be relayed to the species of concern (including contaminants) by electronic conductive phases [5]. However, neither the multi-layer oxide scale on iron is conductive nor natural organic materials have been (univocally) positively tested as ‘electron shuttles’ [9-13]. In fact, the model of oxide scale generation and evolution sustaining the ‘reductive transformation’ concept [9] was proven inconsistent by Odziemkowski and colleagues [10-12]. Moreover, although magnetite films (Fe3O4) are electronic conductive in nature, the whole oxide scale on Fe0 is always made of several layers including layers of FeIII-species [14-16]. This evidence makes quantitative electron transfer from the metal body to species adsorbed at the outer surface of the oxide scale unlikely. In other words, all ‘crutches’ that have supported the introduction of the illusive concept have been proven false, but the concept is still miraculously alive. A cursory look at the literature on remediation with Fe0 reveals a vast scholarship originating from diverse disciplines and using Fe0 of various types and sizes for multiple goals (e.g. environmental remediation, drinking water production, soil cleaning, wastewater treatment) [17-19]. The acronym “zero-valent iron” is used to designate elemental/metallic iron. That is iron in the oxidation state zero (Fe0). The term ‘valence’ in “zero-valent iron” is wrongly 3 used. This misleading acronym is anterior to the Fe0 remediation technology. However, Fe0 is (still almost) univocally used as electron source for contaminant reductive transformation. Current and past researches aim to improve the understanding of interactions within the Fe 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 0/H2O system, such that more efficient systems could be designed. It is obvious that no real improvement is possible when the intrinsic nature of Fe0 is not established/recognized [20]. The intrinsic nature of aqueous metal corrosion is summarized in a paper by Sato [21] in the following terms: “Metallic corrosion produces a layer of corrosion precipitates on the metal surface in aqueous solutions. The interfacial layer thus produced influences the corrosion of underlying metals depending on its ionic and electronic properties. The presence of a gel-like or porous precipitate layer of insoluble rusts such as hydrous metal salts or oxides causes either accelerated metallic corrosion or passivation”. This text recalls that iron is corroded by water and that the Fe0 surface is covered by oxide layers. These layers are non conductive as a rule. Accordingly, regardless from the background of any active researcher, his primary work should consist on elucidating how such a system will behave in the presence of target species, including the contaminants. If such an approach was adopted, a false concept would have not been introduced in the 1990s. Moreover, an alternative view would have not remain 7 years mostly untested. Arguments against the alternative view are numerous and include the following: (i) the prevailing concept is well accepted, (ii) it is not worth to look nearly into the matter, (iii) the author has not presented experimental results, (iv) the author has already published this argument in other forums, (v) no better support of old arguments are given, and (vi) related articles appeared in ‘low impact journal’. Taken together this argumentation is not based on scientific facts and has even not really addressed the crucial point: the reductive transformation concept is simply false. The best pseudo-scientific argument will not correct this mistake. A more scientific attitude recommends that the inherently wrong concept is 4 abandoned and the alternative, already positively tested by few researchers [20,22-24] is considered as the new compass in exploring the Fe 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 0/H2O universe. There is indeed much ado about the operating mode of Fe0/H2O systems, as there should be. The critical issue of this discussion is the mechanism of contaminant removal. This issue is elegantly solved by simply properly considering the iron corrosion literature [14-16]. Alternatively, the thermodynamics of iron oxidative dissolution and the subsequent precipitation of iron phases can be considered. Instead of arguing with examples, scientists should have trusted the expertise of their colleagues who are closer in their academic background to electrochemistry [25,26]. Thus, it is argued that the operating mode of Fe0/H2O systems must be addressed comprehensively through sound interdisciplinary studies. In this effort, expertise of individual scientists should be respected. If individual expertise is not respected, the vast array of ‘scientific’ studies may just seep though the sieve of intellectual selfishness. This intellectual selfishness is as profitless as water in a sieve [27,28]. To conclude, the German thinker, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (28.08.1749 - 22.03.1832) will be quoted: “In the sciences, people quickly come to regard as their own personal property that which they have learned and had passed on to them at the universities and academies. If someone else comes along with new ideas that contradict the Credo and in fact even threaten to overturn it, then all passions are raised against this threat and no method is left untried to suppress it. People resist it in every way possible: pretending not to have heard about it; speaking disparagingly of it, as if it were not even worth the effort of looking into the matter. And so a new truth can have a long wait before finally being accepted." It is amazing, perhaps also surprising, to realize that this observation is valid even for an evidence resulting from a falsification of the mainstream corrosion science. It seems that the primordial motivation for scientific publication is no more the scientific content but some common ‘urgencies’ ("publish or perish"). Relevant ‘urgencies’ include patents, promotions, proposal success or salary increments [29]. "Publish or perish" is an excellent threatening reminder of 5 the importance of the publication of scientific achievements. However, despite simplified accessibility to scientific articles (e.g. SciFinder 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 ®, Scopus®, Web of Sciences®) dealing with Fe0, individual articles must be critically and impartially evaluated. In other words, the ‘‘So what?’’ question [30] should always be in the mind of each author, if scientific progress is sought. Acknowledgements Thanks are due to Sabine Caré (Laboratoire Navier (ENPC/IFSTTAR/CNRS) Paris/France) for fruitful collaboration on the consideration of the expansive nature of iron corrosion. The manuscript was improved by the insightful comments of anonymous reviewers from CLEAN Soil, Air, Water. References [1] D. H. Phillips, T. Van Nooten, L. Bastiaens, M. I. Russell, K. Dickson, S. Plant, J. M. E. Ahad, T. Newton, T. Elliot, R. M. Kalin, Ten year performance evaluation of a field-scale zero-valent iron permeable reactive barrier installed to remediate trichloroethene contaminated groundwater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 3861–3869. [2] R. T. Wilkin, S. D. Acree, R. R. Ross, R. W. Puls, T. R. Lee, L. L. Woods, Fifteen-year assessment of a permeable reactive barrier for treatment of chromate and trichloroethylene in groundwater. Sci. Tot. Environ. 2014, 468–469, 186–194. [3] C. Noubactep, Aqueous contaminant removal by metallic iron: Is the paradigm shifting? Water SA 2011, 37, 419–426. [4] C. Noubactep, Processes of contaminant removal in “Fe0–H2O” systems revisited. The importance of co-precipitation. Open Environ. J. 2007, 1, 9–13. [5] E.J. Weber, Iron-mediated reductive transformations: investigation of reaction mechanism. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 716–719. [6] A. De la Rive, 1830, citation after Roberge [7]. 6 [7] P. R. Roberge, Handbook of corrosion engineering. McGraw-Hill New York/San Francisco, 2000, 1130 pp. 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 [8] U. R. Evans, An Introduction to Metallic Corrosion. London, Edward Arnold Ltd., 3nd ed., 1981, 302 pp. [9] M.M. Scherer, S. Richter, R.L. Valentine, P.J.J. Alvarez, Chemistry and microbiology of permeable reactive barriers for in situ groundwater clean up. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 30, 363–411. [10] K. Ritter, M.S. Odziemkowski, R.W. Gillham, An in situ study of the role of surface films on granular iron in the permeable iron wall technology. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2002, 55, 87–111. [11] M.S. Odziemkowski, R.P. Simpraga, Distribution of oxides on iron materials used for remediation of organic groundwater contaminants - Implications for hydrogen evolution reactions. Can. J. Chem. 2004, 82, 1495–1506. [12] M. Odziemkowski, Spectroscopic studies and reactions of corrosion products at surfaces and electrodes. Spectrosc. Prop. Inorg. Organomet. Compd. 2009, 40, 385–450. [13] F. Fu, W. Han, B. Tang, M. Hu, Z. Cheng, Insights into environmental remediation of heavy metal and organic pollutants: Simultaneous removal of hexavalent chromium and dye from wastewater by zero-valent iron with ligand-enhanced reactivity. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 232, 534–540. [14] M. Cohen, The formation and properties of passive films on iron. Can. J. Chem. 1959, 37, 286–291. [15] M. Cohen, Thin oxide films on iron. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1974, 121, 191C–197C. [16] S. Nesic, Key issues related to modelling of internal corrosion of oil and gas pipelines – A review. Corros. Sci. 2007, 49, 4308–4338. 7 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 [17] S. Comba, A. Di Molfetta, R. Sethi, A Comparison between field applications of nano-, micro-, and millimetric zero-valent iron for the remediation of contaminated aquifers. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 215, 595–607. [18] M. Gheju, Hexavalent chromium reduction with zero-valent iron (ZVI) in aquatic systems. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 222, 103–148. [19] A. Ghauch, G. Ayoub, S. Naim, Degradation of sulfamethoxazole by persulfate assisted micrometric Fe0 in aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 228, 1168–1181. [20] K. Miyajima, Optimizing the design of metallic iron filters for water treatment. Freiberg Online Geoscience 2012, 32, 60 pp. [21] N. Sato, Surface oxides affecting metallic corrosion. Corros. Rev. 2001, 19, 253–272. [22] M. Gheju, I. Balcu, Removal of chromium from Cr(VI) polluted wastewaters by reduction with scrap iron and subsequent precipitation of resulted cations. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 196, 131–138. [23] S. Bilardi, P.S. Calabrò, S. Caré, N. Moraci, C. Noubactep, Improving the sustainability of granular iron/pumice systems for water treatment. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 121, 133–141. [24] A. Ghauch, Iron-based metallic systems: An excellent choice for sustainable water treatment. Habilitation Thesis, University of Grenoble, France, 2013. [25] E. Lipczynska-Kochany, S. Harms, R. Milburn, G. Sprah, N. Nadarajah, Degradation of carbon tetrachloride in the presence of iron and sulphur containing compounds. Chemosphere 1994, 29, 1477–1489. [26] B. K. Lavine, G. Auslander, J. Ritter, Polarographic studies of zero valent iron as a reductant for remediation of nitroaromatics in the environment. Microchem. J. 2001, 70, 69–83. [27] W. Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing. citation after Tobin [18]. 8 204 205 206 207 208 209 [28] G.A. Tobin, Water promises: Much ado about nothing - as profitless as water in a sieve? J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 2009, 142, 1–3. [29] J.L. Schnoor, Announcing Environmental Science & Technology Letters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 7579–7579. [30] A. Berthod, So What? or required content of a review article. Sep. Purif. Rev. 2009, 38, 203–206. 9