http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
Geol. Mag. 151 (3 ), 2014, pp. 381–393. c© Cambridge University Press 2013 381
doi:10.1017/S0016756813000204
A starfish bed in the Middle Miocene Grand Bay Formation of
Carriacou, The Grenadines (West Indies)
JOHN W. M . JAGT∗, BEN THUY†, STEPHEN K . DONOVAN‡§ , SAB INE STÖHR¶,
ROGER W. PORTELL‖, RON K . P ICKER ILL# , DAVID A . T. HARPER∗∗,
W ILL IAM LINDSAY†† & TREVOR A . JACKSON‡‡
∗Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, de Bosquetplein 6-7, NL-6211 KJ Maastricht, The Netherlands
†Geoscience Centre, University of Göttingen, Department of Geobiology, Goldschmidtsrasse 3,
D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
‡Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
¶Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Zoology, Box 50007, SE-10405 Stockholm, Sweden
‖Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
#Department of Geology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 5A3∗∗Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
††9, 8 Maritime Street, Leith, Edinburgh, EH6 6SB, UK
‡‡Seismic Research Centre, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad
(Received 10 December 2012; accepted 13 February 2013; first published online 28 June 2013)
Abstract – The first starfish bed to be recognized from the Antilles is a lensoid body in the middle
Miocene Grand Bay Formation of Carriacou, The Grenadines (West Indies). This unit was deposited in
a turbidite basin in a region of active volcanism fed from one centre and preserves common deep-water
taxa more typical of the Palaeozoic, such as crinoids and brachiopods. The starfish bed is a channel-fill
deposit laid down in at least 150–200 m water depth, although the specimens may have been derived
from shallower water. A goniasterid asteroid and an ophiacanthid ophiuroid have been recognized.
The first articulated asteroid from the Antillean fossil record is Paragonaster(?) haldixoni sp. nov. In
all skeletal features it appears close to the extant Atlantic species Paragonaster grandis H. L. Clark
and P. subtilis (Perrier), but differs in having a single row of rectangular abactinal ossicles extending to
the arm tip; these are longer than wide. The brittlestar, Ophiocamax ventosa sp. nov., is described on
the basis of a fragmentary disc and arms from this deposit. The closest similarities are with the extant
tropical western Atlantic species Ophiocamax hystrix Lyman and O. austera Verrill. However, the new
species has thorns covering the entire surface of dorsal arm plates, while arm spines have a multitude
of small thorns, loosely arranged in numerous rows and dorsal arm plate shape differs markedly. The
occurrence of O. ventosa sp. nov. suggests that Ophiocamax has been a deep-sea taxon at least since
the Miocene.
Keywords: Asteroidea, Goniasteridae, Ophiuroidea, Ophiocanthidae, deep water.
1. Introduction
Until recently, the fossil record of asterozoans (as-
teroids or starfishes, and ophiuroids or brittle and
basket stars) in the Antillean region consisted solely
of disarticulated plates or ossicles (Donovan, 2001),
unlike certain adjacent regions where well-documented
complete specimens are locally common (e.g. Jones &
Portell, 1988; Oyen & Portell, 2001; Blake & Portell,
2009, 2011).Asteroid and ophiuroid ossicles arewidely
distributed in the Upper Cretaceous and Cenozoic
of the Antilles; they deserve further study, but have
received little attention by systematists. In general,
the echinoderm endoskeleton rapidly disarticulates
into its component ossicles after death. As a result,
articulated asterozoan skeletons are exceptional fossils
as they require rapid and effective post-mortem burial
to preserve the ossicles in place (Ausich, 2001).
§Author for correspondence: Steve.Donovan@naturalis.nl
Dissociated asterozoan plates may occur abundantly
as microfossils, but only very few palaeontologists
are expert in the systematics of these plates. Despite
being diverse in the extant, shallow- and deep-water
faunas (e.g. Hendler et al. 1995 and Lyman, 1883,
respectively), Antillean fossil asteroids and ophiuroids
therefore remain essentially unknown and have almost
exclusively been recorded in open nomenclature, when
noted at all. The first ‘starfish bed’ to be recognized
from the region is therefore significant. Its interpret-
ation as a deep-water occurrence of asterozoans has
important implications for our understanding of the
taphonomy and evolution of Antillean echinoderms.
From this deposit, new species of nominal fossil
asteroid and ophiuroid are described.
The specimens described herein are deposited in the
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden (NBCRGM) and
the Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville
(UF).
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
382 J.W.M . JAGT AND OTHERS
Table 1. The fossil record of Cenozoic ophiuroids in the Antillean region.
Age Location; horizon Identity Reference
Late Pleistocene Jamaica; Falmouth Formation ophiuroid vertebrae Donovan et al. (1993)
Late Pliocene Jamaica; Bowden shell bed gorgonocephalid or hemieuryalid vertebrae Donovan & Paul (1998)
Late Pliocene Trinidad; Matura Formation Ophioderma sp. vertebrae Berry (1935)
Middle Miocene Carriacou; Grand Bay Formation Ophiocamax ventosa sp. nov. present paper
Early Miocene Jamaica; Montpelier Formation Ophiomusium? sp. vertebrae Donovan et al. (2005)
Oligo-Miocene Puerto Rico; unnamed formation articulated ophiuroids Vélez-Juarbe & Santos (2008)
Late Oligocene Jamaica; Moneague Formation ophiuroid vertebrae Dixon et al. (1994)
Late Oligocene Puerto Rico; Lares Limestone articulated ophiuroids Vélez-Juarbe & Santos (2008)
2. History of research
Echinoids are the only common and well-documented
echinoderm fossils in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic of
the Antillean region. Although disarticulated ossicles
of asteroids, ophiuroids and crinoids do occur, they are
uncommon, are rarely recognized by palaeontologists
in the field and have received little attention in the
scientific literature (Donovan, 2001). Despite being the
most diverse group of echinoderms in modern shallow-
water environments of the Caribbean (Hendler et al.
1995, pp. 89–195), ophiuroids (Table 1) and asteroids
(Donovan & Schelfhorst, 2012, table 1) are almost
unknown as fossils from the Antilles. The only other
articulated specimens hitherto reported are from the
Oligo-Miocene of PuertoRico (Vélez-Juarbe&Santos,
2008); these have not yet been formally classified and
described.
Our limited knowledge of the distribution of fossil
asteroids and ophiuroids is undoubtedly highly biased,
particularly towards Jamaica, where one of us (SKD)
and his research students have been collecting frag-
mentary echinoderms since 1986. Known occurrences
of asteroid and ophiuroid ossicles in Jamaica are
from units in which considerable research effort was
expended in collecting echinoderms; these are not
the Upper Cretaceous and Eocene formations that
yielded most of the fossil echinoids from Jamaica in
the 1920s and 1930s (Hawkins, 1923, 1924, 1927,
1930; Arnold & Clark, 1927, 1934; Donovan, 1988,
1993), particularly the Lower–Middle Eocene Yellow
Limestone Group. We therefore have the paradoxical
situation that no ophiuroid ossicles are known from
the unit that has yielded the greatest diversity of fossil
echinoderms in Jamaica, although asteroid marginal
plates have been recorded (Donovan, 2001, table 5).
That asterozoans remain almost unknown in the
Antilles has an obvious taphonomic explanation. Ophi-
uroids and asteroids generally have a low preservation
potential and disarticulate rapidly upon death (e.g.
Blake, 1989;Donovan, 1991).Unlike other echinoderm
groups which have some ossicles that are large and
obvious to the naked eye, such as cidaroid spines,
isocrinid columnals and goniasterid marginal plates,
even the largest ophiuroid ossicles, that is, vertebrae,
lateral arm plates and radial shields of the disc, can
only be recognized by micropalaeontological analysis
of poorly lithified sedimentary rock. The same is true
for the majority of the diagnostic plates of asteroids.
A micropalaeontologist will likely not be interested in
echinoderm fragments and most echinoderm workers
concentrate their collecting effort on macrofossils. The
macroscopic specimens described here are not just
the first Antillean fossil ophiuroid and asteroid to be
named, but the first Antillean fossil ophiuroid and
asteroids that were easy to find.
3. Locality and horizon
The specimens described below come from a channel-
fill-sandstone in the Middle Miocene Grand Bay
Formation exposed on the east coast of Carriacou, The
Grenadines, Lesser Antilles (Fig. 1). The following
account is adapted from Donovan et al. (2003). The
Middle Miocene Grand Bay Formation is comprised
principally of beige to light brown, fine- to coarse-
grained volcaniclastic sandstones with intercalated
horizontally and finely laminated to massive silty
and sandy mudstones and calcareous mudstones, and
associated with sporadically developed volcanogenic
pebbly sandstones and conglomerates. The strata
are abundantly fossiliferous, dominated by diverse
assemblages of molluscs, but also including, among
other taxa, scleractinian corals, brachiopods, echinoids,
crinoids, decapod crustaceans, barnacles, algae and
vertebrates (Donovan et al. 2003).
Brief descriptions and palaeoenvironmental inter-
pretations of the strata were presented by Jung (1971)
and Speed et al. (1993), who differed radically in
their conclusions. Based on comparison with extant
molluscan and scleractinian coral faunas, Jung (1971,
pp. 158–60) concluded that the Grand Bay Formation
was a relatively deep-water sequence. In contrast,
Speed et al. (1993, p. 55) speculated that it was a
shallow-water succession. Donovan & Harper (1999,
2001), based on the occurrence of stalked crinoids, bra-
chiopods and the ichnofossil Zoophycos, and Donovan
et al. (2003), referring to the data supplied by sedi-
mentology, ichnology and a wider set of palaeontolo-
gical observations, emphatically supported Jung’s con-
clusion. Sedimentological evidence suggests that the
Grand Bay Formation was deposited in relatively deep
water, and certainly below fair weather and storm wave
base, as the strata do not contain any evidence of wave
activity. In addition, the presence of channels and slump
horizons in the essentially turbiditic sequence suggests
penecontemporaneous erosion and the presence of
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
Starfish bed in Middle Miocene Grand Bay Formation of Carriacou 383
Figure 1. Simplified geological map of Carriacou, after Donovan et al. (2003, fig. 1), and modified after Speed et al. (1993, fig. 7) and
T.A. Jackson (unpub. M.Sc. thesis, University of West Indies, 1970, map), showing principal localities mentioned in text. The starfish
bed is at the south end of Jew Bay, north of Tarleton Point and beneath the Quaternary cover. Inset map of Lesser Antillean region
shows the position of Carriacou (arrowed). Key: B = Barbados; Ca = Carriacou; PR = Puerto Rico; To = Tobago; Tr = Trinidad;
Ve = Venezuela; VI = Virgin Islands.
some form of slope. Based on various lines of evidence,
the depth of deposition was at least 150–200 m (Jung,
1971; Donovan & Harper, 1999, 2001; Donovan et al.
2003) and probably deeper (Donovan, 2012). At this
water depth taxa typically found in modern bathyal
settings, such as articulated brachiopods and stalked
crinoids (Donovan & Veltkamp, 2001), thrived in the
Caribbean and continue to do so.
Recently published geochemical analyses have
demonstrated a single source for the various volcanic
grains incorporated in this turbiditic deposit (Jackson
et al. 2008), but the volcanic centre from which it
originated remains unknown. This combination of tur-
bidite basin deposition in a region of active volcanism
led to the formation of a rare sedimentary deposit: a
starfish bed. This starfish bed is the only one known
from the Antilles and the sole deposit in the region to
yield both an articulated asteroid (Figs 2, 3) and an
articulated ophiuroid (Figs 4–6) although, admittedly,
both specimens are incomplete.
The starfish bed is to the north of Tarleton Point
in Jew Bay (Fig. 1), to the north of the stream and
in the area of Jung’s (1971) localities 10706–10723
(GPS 12◦ 29′ 25′′ N, 61◦ 25′ 30′′ W). This horizon is
exposed beneath the angular unconformity with the
overlying Quaternary Carriacou root beds (Donovan
et al. 2002). The fossil asterozoans are higher in the
succession than the measured section of Harper &
Pickerill (2008, fig. 2). Although grant support was
forthcoming to support further research of this deposit,
problems of access prevented our return.
4. Systematic palaeontology
Class ASTEROIDEA de Blainville, 1830
Subclass NEOASTEROIDEA Gale, 1987
Order VALVATIDA Perrier, 1884
Family GONIASTERIDAE Forbes, 1841
Genus Paragonaster Sladen, 1885
Type species. Paragonaster ctenipes Sladen, 1889, by
subsequent designation of Fisher (1919).
Diagnosis. Goniasterid with stellate body form;
abactinal ossicles paxilliform, covered with rounded
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
384 J.W.M . JAGT AND OTHERS
Figure 2. In situ asteroid, Paragonaster(?) haldixoni sp. nov., UF 114750, holotype, in the Middle Miocene starfish bed of the Grand
Bay Formation of Carriacou.
granules; one median row of abactinals extending to
terminal, usually somewhat rectangular in shape and
wider than long; adambulacral furrow margin angular;
apical oral spine unpaired; no pedicellariae (modified
from Clark & Downey, 1992, p. 255).
Range. Middle Miocene (the present record) to Recent
(Clark & Downey, 1992).
Paragonaster(?) haldixoni sp. nov.
Figures 2, 3
?2001 unidentified marginal ossicles; Donovan,
table 5.
2003 Astropecten sp. nov.; Donovan et al. p. 264.
2008a goniasterid asteroid; Donovan et al. p. 52.
2008b goniasterid asteroid; Donovan et al. p. 18.
Etymology. For our late colleague and co-author,
Harold L. ‘Hal’ Dixon, formerly of the Department
of Geology, University of the West Indies, Mona, in re-
cognition of his contribution to Caribbean invertebrate
palaeontology.
Holotype. UF 114750, the only specimen known.
Related material. Disarticulated asteroid marginal
ossicles occur rarely in the basal part of the Grand
Bay Formation, in association with crinoid ossicles
(Donovan & Veltkamp, 2001), and at other horizons
in this unit (NBC RGM 188 797 and 188 798).
Larger collections are required before it is possible to
determine if they are conspecificwith the present taxon.
The type locality of Paragonaster(?) haldixoni sp. nov.
has yielded two other asteroid specimens belonging to
different species; one of these disintegrated soon after
it was collected and the other represents a fragment of
a spinose arm (NBC RGM 188 799).
Type locality and horizon. A channel-fill sandstone in
the Grand Bay Formation (MiddleMiocene) on the east
coast of Carriacou, The Grenadines, Lesser Antilles.
The locality is to the north of Tarleton Point in Jew Bay
(Fig. 1), to the north of the stream and in the area of Jung
(1971) localities 10706–10723 (GPS 12◦ 29′ 25′′ N,
61◦ 25′ 30′′ W). The ophiuroid/asteroid-bearing bed is
exposed beneath the angular unconformity with the
overlying Quaternary Carriacou root beds (see above).
Preparation. The specimen was collected in two main
pieces, broken through the proximal area of one arm,
with some separated ossicles. The two large parts were
joined with a viscous solution of Paraloid B72 (a
copolymer of ethyl methacrylate andmethyl acrylate in
acetone) after the joint surfaces were consolidated with
Paraloid B72 diluted in butan-2-one. Ossicles were re-
attached to the ends of one arm.
Most of the asteroid was enclosed in the mat-
rix, which consisted of fine-grained sandstone with
granular fragments, but the distal ends of the arms
were already visible. The matrix was soft enough
to remove with a hand-held tungsten carbide needle,
but responded more readily to preparation using an
airbrasive (Texas Airsonics HP series) with 50 microns
grade sodium bicarbonate powder. Powder flow and air
pressure were adjusted to avoid damage to the fossil
calcite. Preparation commenced on the apical side and
this surface was wholly exposed before the oral surface
was addressed. The matrix was completely removed
from one of the interradial areas, but left attached on
other margins to allow handling and to support the
adhesive joint. A dilute solution of Paraloid B72 in
butan-2-one was applied to the exposed fossil surface
to cement the ossicles in place.
Diagnosis. Medium-sized goniasterid of stellate, flat
form; arms long, slender and pointed; abactinal ossicles
paxilliform; single row of abactinals, longer than
wide, extending to arm tip; R/r = > 3.2/1; uniform
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
Starfish bed in Middle Miocene Grand Bay Formation of Carriacou 385
Figure 3. Paragonaster(?) haldixoni sp. nov., UF 114750, holotype, Middle Miocene starfish bed, Carriacou, The Grenadines. (a)
Abactinal (dorsal) surface. (b) Actinal (oral) surface. (c, e) Details of marginal frame and abactinal plating, respectively. (d, f, g) Details
of the mouth frame, actinal plating and marginal frame, respectively. (h, i) Arms in section. Specimen coated with ammonium chloride.
All scale bars represent 10 mm.
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
386 J.W.M . JAGT AND OTHERS
Figure 4. In situ ophiuroid, Ophiocamax ventosa sp. nov., NBC RGM 791 150, holotype, in the Middle Miocene starfish bed of the
Grand Bay Formation of Carriacou. Scale bar represents 10 mm.
granulation on superomarginals and inferomarginals;
large oral plates and robust, angular adambulacrals.
Description. Disc of medium size; major radius (R)
> 37.4 mm (arm tips missing); minor radius (r)
11.6 mm; R/r = > 3.2/1; flat, stellate, arms long
and pointed (although incompletely preserved), five
in number; gradually tapering distally; interradii mod-
erately narrow with rounded angles; superomarginals
low, recumbent on abactinal surface, much wider
than long interradially and along arm bases (W/L
ratio c. 3.6), more distally W/L ratio decreases to
1.6; interradial superomarginals slightly cuneate; more
distally, superomarginals almost meet adradially, being
separated by a single row of rectangular abactinal
ossicles; ornament of numerous (>80), close-set round
granules, of comparable size along disc and arms; distal
and proximal facets flat to slightly concave, bordered
by well-developed articulation ridge, parallel to ossicle
curvature and bordered by shallow groove. Number of
superomarginals, counted from centre of interradius to
arm tip (as preserved) >15.
Inferomarginals low, regularly curved on actinal
surface, much wider than long interradially and along
arm bases (W/L ratio c. 3.3), more distally W/L ratio
decreases to 1.25 and less; interradial inferomarginals
clearly cuneate, equalling width of corresponding
superomarginals; more distal inferomarginals longer
than wide, their width equalling half (or less) of
corresponding superomarginal width; ornament appar-
ently less coarse than that of superomarginals, with
comparable round granules.
Abactinal ossicles numerous, paxilliform, of more
or less uniform size; ornament of few granules; mad-
reporite not distinguished; a single row of rectangular
abactinals extends to end of arm (not preserved).
Oral (actinal) surface collapsed; mouth central,
small, defined by ten relatively large, prominent oral
plates; no apical oral and suboral spines preserved;
adambulacral ossicles robust, angular, no spines
preserved.
Discussion. Although details of inferomarginal, oral
and adambulacral granulation and spination cannot be
assessed, the present specimenwould appear to be close
to the genus Paragonaster, although the rectangular
abactinals of the single row that extends to the arm tip
are longer than wide, rather than wider than long. For
that reason, the new species is assigned to that genus
with a query. Clark & Downey (1992, pp. 255–7, pl.
62A–D) recorded two extant species of Paragonaster
from the Atlantic, P. grandis H. L. Clark, 1941 and
P. subtilis (Perrier, 1881). The former, known from
relatively shallow waters (257–540 m) off Cuba and
northernBrazil, has anR/r ratio of 3.0/1 (i.e. close to the
Carriacou form), but possesses more superomarginals
and abactinal ossicles extend further into the arm base.
In UF 114750, superomarginals at the arm base are
first separated by a single row of rectangular abactinals
from number 6; these are longer than wide. The second
extant species, which occurs in deep-water settings
(1845–4700 m) of the North American basin (off New
York to Norfolk, Virginia), Gulf of Mexico, Azores and
Rockall Trough to theGulf ofGuinea, has very long and
attenuate arms and an R/r ratio of 5.1/1. This, and the
fact that it has more angular granules on inferomarginal
ossicles and abactinals that are wider than long in the
distal arm portion, differentiates it from P.(?) haldixoni
sp. nov.
Remarks. Antillean fossil asteroids are known from
six islands, ranging in age from Late Cretaceous to
Pleistocene (Donovan, 2001; Donovan & Schelfhorst,
2012), but only from disarticulated marginal plates
that have not received adequate study. The two
nominal fossil asteroid taxa from the region are
from Cuba; these are the goniasterid Nymphaster
miocenicus Valette, 1926, and the stauranderasterid
Stauranderaster sanchezi Valette, 1926. These are
either of Early Miocene (Valette, 1926, pp. 25, 26) or
Early Eocene age (Sánchez Roig, 1949, pp. 294, 295).
The poor line drawings of dissociatedmarginal ossicles
that accompany the original descriptions show enough
detail to confirm that they are utterly different from the
new Carriacou species (Valette, 1926, pl. 1, figs 1, 2).
Other published illustrations of marginal ossicles from
the Middle Cenozoic of the region include the Lower
Miocene (Donovan et al. 2005), and the Pliocene of
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
Starfish bed in Middle Miocene Grand Bay Formation of Carriacou 387
Figure 5. Ophiocamax ventosa sp. nov., NBC RGM 791 150, holotype, Middle Miocene starfish bed, Carriacou, The Grenadines.
(a) Oblique lateral view of arm; (b) spine; (c) lateral view of arm. Scale bar represents 1.5 mm. (d) Latero-dorsal view of arm; (e)
latero-dorsal view of arm; (f) close-up of arm spine base. Scale bar represents 0.6 mm. All scanning electron micrographs. Scale bars
represent 1.2 mm, unless stated otherwise.
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
388 J.W.M . JAGT AND OTHERS
Figure 6. Ophiocamax ventosa sp. nov., NBC RGM 791 150, holotype. (a) Disc with proximal portions of arms in dorsal view; (b)
proximal arm segments in lateral view; (c) proximal to median arm segments in dorsal view; (d) arm spines attached to proximal arm
segments in dorsal view; note numerous planktonic foraminifera in matrix. Scale bars represent 2 mm.
Jamaica andCuraçao (Donovan&Paul, 1998;Donovan
& Schelfhorst, 2012); neither provides a convincing
match.
Any environmental signal from this fossil is un-
certain. Extant asteroids from the tropical western
Atlantic occur at a multiplicity of water depths.
The Grand Bay Formation, although undoubtedly
deposited in deeper water, contains a range of benthic
fossils and ichnofossils indicative of a range of
palaeoenvironments, from terrestrial to deeper water
(Donovan & Harper, 1999; Donovan et al. 2003);
such mixed assemblages are typical of oceanic islands
with steep shelves (Donovan, 2002; Donovan et al.
2011). While it is tempting to suggest that the asteroids
of this deposit were channel dwellers living in deep
water that were overcome by a turbidity current, they
may equally represent shallow-water taxa carried with
the sediment mass flow into deeper water. However,
the evidence provided by the associated deep-water
ophiuroid Ophiocamax ventosa sp. nov. suggests that
this is unlikely.
It is difficult to interpret the evolution of the
Asteroidea within the Caribbean on the basis of the
limited fossil evidence. The modern fauna is diverse.
Hendler et al. (1995) recorded 13 asteroid species from
shallow water (30 m or less, that is, scuba depth),
and Downey (1973) noted 95 species belonging to 56
genera from theCaribbean andGulf ofMexico (see also
Clark & Downey, 1992). The Antillean fossil record is
largely limited to disarticulated marginal ossicles; a
single, nominal Miocene asteroid seemingly adds little
to the picture. It has been suggested elsewhere that
the ‘modern’ echinoid and (less confidently) crinoid
faunas of the region mainly evolved from those taxa
that survived the Eocene–Oligocene extinction events
or migrated into the region soon afterwards (Dixon
& Donovan, 1994; Donovan, 2001). It is largely
speculation at present to postulate a similar pattern in
the Asteroidea.
Class OPHIUROIDEA Gray, 1840
Order OPHIURIDA Müller & Troschel, 1840
Suborder OPHIURINA Müller & Troschel, 1840
Family OPHIACANTHIDAE Ljungman, 1867
Genus Ophiocamax Müller & Troschel, 1840
Type species. Ophiocamax vitrea Lyman, 1878, by
original designation (see Spencer & Wright, 1966).
Diagnosis. Ophiacanthid with large, stout radial shields
and well-developed, small disc plates covered by
thin skin; oral papillae spine-like and arranged in
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
Starfish bed in Middle Miocene Grand Bay Formation of Carriacou 389
multiple rows; cluster of spine-like apical papillae;
basal tentacle scales erect; dorsal and ventral arm plates
commonly with thorns; arm spines long and thorny;
second or third dorsal-most spine articulation often
enlarged.
Range. Lower Miocene (Ishida, 2001) to Recent
(Spencer & Wright, 1966).
Ophiocamax ventosa sp. nov.
Figures 4–6
2008a ophiothricid(?) ophiuroid; Donovan et al.
p. 52.
2008b ophiacanthid ophiuroid; Donovan et al. p. 18.
Etymology. From Latin, ventosus (-a), meaning
‘windy,’ but also ‘fickle,’ in reference to its geographic
provenance and the alternation of spine articulations on
lateral arm plates.
Holotype. A fragmentary disc and proximal portions
of five arms, NBC RGM 791 150. The only specimen
known.
Type locality and horizon. A channel-fill sandstone in
the Grand Bay Formation (MiddleMiocene) on the east
coast of Carriacou, The Grenadines, Lesser Antilles.
The locality is to the north of Tarleton Point in Jew Bay
(Fig. 1), to the north of the stream and in the area of Jung
(1971) localities 10706–10723 (GPS 12◦ 29′ 25′′ N,
61◦ 25′ 30′′ W). The ophiuroid-bearing bed is exposed
beneath the angular unconformity with the overlying
Quaternary Carriacou root beds (see above).
Diagnosis. A species of Ophiocamax with large radial
shields, equalling or exceeding half the disc diameter
in length; proximal dorsal arm plates irregularly
pentagonal, slightly wider than long, devoid of lateral
wings and uniformly covered by coarse thorns; arm
spines cylindrical with numerous small thorns, loosely
arranged in irregular longitudinal rows.
Description. Disc fragmentary, exposing the dorsal
side, reconstructed disc diameter c.17 mm; radial
shields large, nearly triangular, slightly longer than
half the disc diameter, contiguous; remaining dorsal
disc plates poorly preserved; no disc spines or granules
discernible; ventral side of disc unknown. Arms large
(5.5 mm wide at base), preserving proximal and
median portions; ventral arm plates not preserved;
lateral arm plates strongly constricted, higher than
wide in proximal segments, as high as wide in median
ones; outer surface without conspicuous ornament or
spurs on the proximal edge; up to five very large, ear-
shaped to near-circular spine articulations with well-
developed sigmoidal fold; size of spine articulations
and gaps separating them strongly increasing in size
dorsalwards; largest spine articulation dorsalmost on
some segments, second or third dorsalmost on other
segments, resulting in alternating pattern along the
arm; spine articulations freestanding on broad, sharply
elevated ridge in the middle of the distal half of
the plate; dorsal spine articulations conspicuously
facing dorsalwards or dorso-distalwards. Dorsal arm
plates slightly wider than long in proximal segments,
nearly as wide as long in median segments, irregularly
pentagonal, with convex distal edge, straight proximal-
wards converging lateral edges and obtuse to nearly
right proximal angle; entire outer surface of dorsal
arm plates beset with scattered coarse, low thorns;
dorsal arm plates in contact on all observable arm
segments, separating dorsal tips of lateral arm plates.
Arm spines very large, at least as long as three arm
segments, cylindrical, finely reticulate with numerous
small distalward-pointing thorns irregularly arranged
in several longitudinal rows.
Remarks. The very large arm spines positioned on
spine articulation with a well-developed sigmoidal
fold clearly place this specimen in the family Ophi-
acanthidae. Within this family, large radial shields in
combination with thorny arm spines and dorsal arm
plates are typically found in the genus Ophiocamax.
Detailed comparison of the morphology of lateral arm
plates in extant ophiacanthids further suggests that
nearly circular arm spine articulations positioned on
a broad, sharply elevated ridge in the middle of the
distal half of the plate, rather than at its distal edge,
and an alternating pattern in the position of the largest
spine articulation (varying between arm segments from
dorsalmost to second or third dorsalmost), as observed
in the above-described specimen, are exclusive features
of Ophiocamax. Assignment to this extant genus is
therefore warranted, although we could not confirm the
presence of other diagnostic characters of this genus
such as the cluster of apical papillae, the spine-like oral
papillae arranged in multiple rows and the erect basal
tentacle scales.
The genus Ophiocamax currently includes 11
accepted species (Stöhr & O’Hara, unpub. data,
http://www.marinespecies.org/ophiuroidea/). Among
these, theAntarctic speciesOphiocamax gigasKoehler,
1900, O. applicatus Koehler, 1922 and O. drygalskii
Hertz, 1926, the North Atlantic O. patersoni Martynov
& Litvinova, 2008, the western Pacific O. nominata
(Koehler, 1930), and O. brevicetra Baker, 1974, from
off New Zealand differ from the Carriacou specimen in
having considerably smaller radial shields. TheAtlantic
species O. dominans Koehler, 1906, and O. fasciculata
Lyman, 1883, have smooth, triangular dorsal arm
plates. Ophiocamax vitrea Lyman, 1878, differs in
having much wider dorsal arm plates displaying lateral
projections.
Similarities are greatestwithO. hystrixLyman, 1878,
and O. austera Verrill, 1899, which are widespread
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
390 J.W.M . JAGT AND OTHERS
in the Gulf of Mexico and, in the case of the
former, in the Caribbean (Stöhr & O’Hara, unpub.
data, http://www.marinespecies.org/ophiuroidea/). Al-
thoughO. austera and theMioceneCarriacou specimen
share very similarly shaped dorsal arm plates, the
former differs in having thorns restricted to the distal
edge of, rather than covering, the entire surface of
the dorsal arm plate. In addition, the arm spines
of O. austera generally display very large thorns
arranged in few regular longitudinal rows rather than
a multitude of small thorns, loosely arranged in
numerous rows. In O. hystrix, the dorsal arm plates
display uniformly scattered thorns on their outer
surface, as in the Miocene specimen, but the shape of
the dorsal arm plates markedly differs. Thus, although
rather limited, the morphological information extracted
from the Carriacou specimen cannot be reconciled
with the diagnoses of currently accepted species of
Ophiocamax.
We therefore propose the new species O. ventosa sp.
nov. for the Carriacou specimen. It is the first fossil
species of Ophiocamax to be described formally. The
genus has been previously recorded from the Lower
Miocene of Aichi, Japan and the Upper Miocene of
Yamagata, Japan (Ishida, 2001) which, along with
the Caribbean record described here, implies that
Ophiocamax had attainedmuch of its present-day, near-
cosmopolitan distribution by the Middle Miocene. The
striking morphological similarities between O. ventosa
sp. nov. and the two extant, tropical western Atlantic
species, namely O. hystrix and O. austera, suggests
that the former might be the ancestor of one, or even
both, of the latter. We must however concede that the
similarities only pertain to the morphological features
exposed on the fossil specimen. Characterswhich could
not be observed, in particular those of the mouth
skeleton, could well challenge the strong similarities to
the two above-mentioned extant species. The Carriacou
material suggests that Ophiocamax has been a typical
deep-sea group at least since the Miocene, and that
the origin of the two extant tropical western Atlantic
species, O. hystrix and O. austera (or at least of one
of them), most probably lies in the Caribbean. In
making the latter declaration the assumption is, of
course, that the strongmorphological similarity of these
extant species to Miocene O. ventosa sp. nov. implies
phylogenetic proximity.
There are some similarities with the Late Jurassic
Ophiothrix(?) royeri (de Loriol, 1872) (Hess, 1960,
pp. 396–401, figs 7, 8), known from articulated arm
fragments and shown by Hess (1972) to be a junior
synonym of Ophiurella bispinosa d’Orbigny, 1850.
In fact, the Jurassic form displays a conspicuous
alternating pattern in the position of the largest
spine articulation. Here, however, the largest spine
articulation is always the dorsalmost, the position of
which varies between arm segments, from close to
the remaining spine articulations to separated from the
latter by a large gap. In O. ventosa sp. nov., in contrast,
the largest spine articulation varies in position because
it is the dorsalmost in some segments and the second or
third dorsalmost in others. Similarities to the Jurassic
form are therefore superficial at most.
5. Discussion
Although largely limited to active continental margins,
outcrops of fossiliferous,Neogene, deep-water deposits
are reasonably common, yet articulated deep-sea
asterozoans are rare fossils. The potential of asteroids
and ophiuroids to be fossilized as articulated skeletons
largely depends on the occurrence of sediment mass
transport events resulting in quick and effective
burial of the skeletons. However, in deep-sea offshore
settings, sedimentation rates are generally low and
large-scale displacements of sediment masses are
exceptional events usually bound to downslope gravity
flows and turbidity currents (e.g. Menzies et al. 1973).
It is therefore not surprising that articulated deep-sea
asterozoan skeletons are even more rarely preserved
than their shallow-water equivalents. As demonstrated
by the Carriacou starfish bed, deeper-water deposits
associated with islands in tectonically and volcanically
active areas such as the LesserAntilles hold the promise
of further significant finds.
The discovery of these specimens suggests that
rare, complete fossil specimens of other Caribbean
echinoderm groups that are common at the present
day, such as diadematoid echinoids (Donovan, 2005)
and stalked crinoids (Donovan & Veltkamp, 2001),
may eventually be found; indeed, the first articulated
ophiuroid from the Antilles was recently reported from
Puerto Rico (Vélez-Juarbe & Santos, 2008). Why
no complete specimens of these taxa, otherwise only
known from disarticulated ossicles, are known from the
region remains uncertain. At least some of the deposits
generated by mechanisms otherwise recognized as
favourable to preservation, such as turbiditic (e.g.
Pickerill et al. 1995) and pyroclastic deposits (e.g.
T.A. Jackson, unpub. M.Sc. thesis, University of West
Indies, 1970; Jackson, 1980), are locally common
in the Antillean rock record; indeed, the Carriacou
starfish bed is preserved in a turbidite derived from a
volcanic source (Jackson et al. 2008). For comparison,
there is a globally recognized paucity of articulated
Cenozoic fossil crinoids (Hess, 1999). The only truly
crinoid-rich deposits known from theAntilles underlies
the Grand Bay Formation sensu stricto at Point
Saint Hilaire (Donovan & Veltkamp, 2001) (Fig. 1),
yet the most complete specimens from these highly
fossiliferous beds are rare short lengths of isocrinid
pluricolumnals (<10 columnals). It is apparent that
some taphonomic pathways in the Cenozoic of the
tropical western Atlantic remain to be adequately
explained.
The most abundant and best-studied Neogene oc-
currences of articulated deep-sea echinoderms have
been reported from Japan (e.g. Oji, 2001; Ishida, 2001;
Ishida et al. 2009). Our study adds another record
to the extremely rare fossil occurrences of articulated
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
Starfish bed in Middle Miocene Grand Bay Formation of Carriacou 391
deep-sea echinoderms. The latter are the most import-
ant and unambiguous source of evidence to assess the
evolutionary history of modern and ancient deep-sea
echinoderm lineages.
Acknowledgements. Support for fieldwork in Carriacou
was provided by National Geographic Society grants 5722-
96, 6625-99 and 8445-08, which are gratefully acknow-
ledged. Additional support for fieldwork was provided
by the McGinty Endowment of the Florida Museum of
Natural History (to R.W.P.) and the National Sciences and
EngineeringResearchCouncil ofCanada (toR.K.P.). The late
Dr Roy Blackman helped in the field during 2001. We thank
S.L. Jakobsen (Statens Naturhistorisk Museum, Copenha-
gen, Denmark) and B.W.M. van Bakel (Oertijdmuseum De
Groene Poort, Boxtel, the Netherlands) for preparation of
the disc and proximal arm portions and photographs of the
ophiuroid, respectively. We thank the Photographic Unit,
The Natural History Museum, London, for preparing the
images in Figure 3. Scanning electron micrographs of the
ophiuroid were produced by S.S. at Stockholm; J.W.M.J.
gratefully acknowledges the financial support through the
European Commission’s (FP 6) Integrated Infrastructure
Initiative programme SYNTHESYS grant system (SE-TAF-
1530), which allowed him to work on extant ophiuroids
at the Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm
(September 2006). This is University of Florida Contribution
to Paleobiology 586. We thank Christopher R.C. Paul
(University of Bristol) and a second, anonymous referee for
their positive comments.
References
ARNOLD, B. W. & CLARK, H. L. 1927. Jamaican fossil
echini.Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology,
Harvard 50, 1–75.
ARNOLD, B. W. & CLARK, H. L. 1934. Some additional
fossil echini from Jamaica. Memoirs of the Museum of
Comparative Zoology, Harvard 54, 139–56.
AUSICH, W. I. 2001. Echinoderm taphonomy. In Echinoderm
Studies 6 (eds M. Jangoux & J. M. Lawrence), pp. 171–
227. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
BAKER, A. N. 1974. New species of brittle-stars from New
Zealand (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Records of the
Dominion Museum 8, 247–66.
BERRY, C. T. 1935. A Pliocene ophiuran from Trinidad.
Journal of Paleontology 9, 430–33.
BLAINVILLE, H. M. D. DE. 1830. Dictionnaire des Sciences
Naturelles. F. G. Levrault, Paris, 60 volumes text, 12
volumes plates, one volume portraits.
BLAKE, D. B. 1989. Asteroidea: functional morphology,
classification and phylogeny. In Echinoderm Studies 3
(eds M. Jangoux & J. M. Lawrence), pp. 179–223. A.A.
Balkema, Rotterdam and Brookfield.
BLAKE, D. B. & PORTELL, R.W. 2009. Implications for
the study of fossil Asteroidea (Echinodermata) of new
genera and species from the Eocene of Florida. Journal
of Paleontology 83, 562–74.
BLAKE, D. B. & PORTELL, R.W. 2011. Kionaster petersonae,
n. gen. and sp. (Asteroidea), the first fossil occurrence
of the Asterodiscididae, from the Miocene of Florida.
Swiss Journal of Palaeontology 130, 25–42.
CLARK, A. M. & DOWNEY, M. E. 1992. Starfishes of the
Atlantic. Chapman and Hall, London, xxvi+794 pp.
CLARK, H. L. 1941. Reports on the scientific results of
the Atlantis expeditions to the West Indies under the
joint auspices of the University of Havana and Harvard
University. The echinoderms (other than holothurians).
Memorias del Sociedad Cubana de Historia Natural 15,
1–154.
DIXON, H. L. & DONOVAN, S. K. 1994. Local extinction
patterns and the decline of the Jamaican Paleogene
echinoid fauna. Palaios 9, 506–11.
DIXON, H. L., DONOVAN, S. K. & VELTKAMP, C. J. 1994.
Crinoid and ophiuroid ossicles from the Oligocene of
Jamaica. Caribbean Journal of Science 30, 143–5.
DONOVAN, S. K. 1988. A preliminary biostratigraphy of the
Jamaican fossil Echinoidea. In Echinoderm Biology:
Proceedings of the Sixth International Echinoderm
Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, 23–28 August,
1987 (eds R. D. Burke, P. V. Mladenov, P. Lambert & R.
L. Parsley), pp. 125–31. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
DONOVAN, S. K. 1991. The taphonomy of echinoderms:
calcareous multi–element skeletons in the marine
environment. In The Processes of Fossilization (ed. S.
K. Donovan), pp. 241–69. Belhaven Press, London.
DONOVAN, S. K. 1993. Jamaican Cenozoic Echinoidea. In
Biostratigraphy of Jamaica (eds R. M. Wright & E.
Robinson), pp. 371–412. Geological Society of America
Memoir 182, x+492 pp.
DONOVAN, S. K. 2001. Evolution of Caribbean ech-
inoderms during the Cenozoic: moving towards a
complete picture using all of the fossils. Palaeo-
geography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 166,
177–92.
DONOVAN, S. K. 2002. Island shelves, downslope transport
and shell assemblages. Lethaia 35, 277.
DONOVAN, S. K. 2005. The fossil record of Diadema in the
Caribbean. Coral Reefs 24, 603–5.
DONOVAN, S. K., GORDON, C. M., VELTKAMP, C. J. &
SCOTT, A. D. 1993. Crinoids, asteroids and ophiuroids
in the Jamaican fossil record. In Biostratigraphy of
Jamaica (eds R.M.Wright & E. Robinson), pp. 125–30.
Geological Society of America Memoir 182, x+492 pp.
DONOVAN, S. K. & HARPER, D. A. T. 1999. A new
paleobathymetric interpretation of the Middle Miocene
Grand Bay Formation of Carriacou (Grenadines, Lesser
Antilles). Ichnos 6, 283–8.
DONOVAN, S. K. & HARPER, D. A. T. 2001. Brachio-
pod/crinoid associations in the late Cenozoic of the
Antillean region. In Brachiopods: Past and Present (ed.
C. H. C. Brunton, L. R. M. Cocks & S. L. Long),
pp. 268–74. Taylor and Francis, London.
DONOVAN, S. K., HARPER, D. A. T., PORTELL, R.
W., PICKERILL, R. K., JACKSON, T. A., JAGT,
J. W. M. & LINDSAY, W. 2008a. Stars of the Caribbean
Miocene: Grand Bay Formation, Carriacou, The Gren-
adines. The Palaeontological Association Newsletter 69
(Supplement), 51–2.
DONOVAN, S. K., JACKSON, T. A., PORTELL, R. W.,
PICKERILL, R. K., HARPER, D. A. T. & JAGT, J.
W. M. 2008b. A starfish bed in the Lesser Antilles:
Grand Bay Formation (Middle Miocene), Carriacou,
The Grenadines. Abstracts, Foundations & Directions:
Celebrating Geography and Geology at the University
of the West Indies, Kingston Jamaica, 7–11 July, 17–18.
DONOVAN, S. K. & PAUL, C. R. C. 1998. Echinoderms
of the Pliocene Bowden shell bed, southeast Jamaica.
Contributions to Tertiary and Quaternary Geology 35,
129–46.
DONOVAN, S. K., PICKERILL, R. K. & PORTELL, R. W. 2002.
A late Cenozoic ‘root bed’, an unconformity and the
tectonic history of Carriacou, The Grenadines, Lesser
Antilles. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association
113, 199–205.
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
392 J.W.M . JAGT AND OTHERS
DONOVAN, S. K., PICKERILL, R. K., PORTELL, R. W.,
JACKSON, T. A. & HARPER, D. A. T. 2003. Miocene
palaeobathymetry and palaeoenvironments of Car-
riacou, the Grenadines, Lesser Antilles. Lethaia 36,
255–72.
DONOVAN, S. K., PORTELL, R. W. & VELTKAMP, C. J. 2005.
Lower Miocene echinoderms of Jamaica, West Indies.
Scripta Geologica 129, 91–135.
DONOVAN, S. K., PORTELL, R. W. & WAVEREN, I. M. VAN.
2011. Island slopes and jumbled shell beds. Scripta
Geologica 142, 17–18.
DONOVAN, S. K. & SCHELFHORST, R. 2012. A Pliocene
asteroid from the Netherlands Antilles. Bulletin of the
Mizunami Fossil Museum 38, 75–7.
DONOVAN, S. K. & VELTKAMP, C. J. 2001. The Antillean
Tertiary crinoid fauna. Journal of Paleontology 75, 721–
31.
DOWNEY, M. E. 1973. Starfishes from the Caribbean and the
Gulf of Mexico. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology
126, vi+158 pp.
FISHER, W. K. 1919. Starfishes of the Philippine seas and
adjacent waters. Bulletin of the United States National
Museum 3(100), 1–547.
FORBES, E. 1841. A History of British Starfish and Other
Animals of the Class Echinodermata. John Van Voorst,
London, 267 pp.
GALE, A. S. 1987. Phylogeny and classification of the
Asteroidea (Echinodermata). Zoological Journal of the
Linnean Society 89, 107–32.
GRAY, J. E. 1840. A synopsis of the genera and species
of the Class Hypostoma (Asterias Linne). Annals and
Magazine of Natural History (1)6, 175–84, 275–90.
HARPER, D. A. T. & PICKERILL, R. K. 2008. Generation of
brachiopod-dominated shell beds in the Miocene rocks
of Carriacou, Lesser Antilles. Geological Journal 43,
573–81.
HAWKINS, H. L. 1923. Some Cretaceous Echinoidea from
Jamaica. Geological Magazine 60, 199–216.
HAWKINS, H. L. 1924. Notes on a new collection of fossil
Echinoidea from Jamaica. Geological Magazine 61,
312–24.
HAWKINS, H. L. 1927. Descriptions of new species of
Cainozoic Echinoidea from Jamaica. Memoirs of the
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard 50, 76–
84.
HAWKINS, H. L. 1930. In C. T. TRECHMANN, The Man-
chioneal Beds of Jamaica, pp. 215–16. Geological
Magazine 78, 199–218.
HENDLER, G., MILLER, J. E., PAWSON, D. L. & KIER, P. M.
1995. Sea Stars, Sea Urchins, and Allies: Echinoderms
of Florida and the Caribbean. Smithsonian Institution
Press, Washington, DC, xi+390 pp.
HERTZ, M. 1926. Die Ophiuroiden der Deutschen Südpolar-
Expedition 1901–1903. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition
1901–1903 im Auftrage des Reichsministeriums des
Inneren herausgegeben von Erich von Drygalski, 19.
Zoologie 11, 1–54+ii. Walter De Gryter Inc., Berlin.
HESS, H. 1960. Ophiurenreste aus dem Malm des Schweizer
Juras und des Departements Haut-Rhin. Eclogae geolo-
gicae Helvetiae 53, 385–421.
HESS, H. 1972. Eine Echinodermen-Fauna aus demmittleren
Dogger des Aargauer Juras. Schweizerische Paläontolo-
gische Abhandlungen 92, 1–87.
HESS, H. 1999. Tertiary. In Fossil Crinoids (eds Hess, H.,
Ausich, W. I., Brett, C. E. & Simms, M. J.), pp. 233–6.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, xv+275 pp.
ISHIDA, Y. 2001. Cenozoic ophiuroids from Japan; par-
ticularly those conspecific with extant species. In
Echinoderm Research 2001 (eds J.-P. Féral & B. David),
pp. 53–9. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse.
ISHIDA,Y.,KOIKE,H.&NARITA,K. 2009.Ophiacantha (Ech-
inodermata, Ophiuroidea) from the middle Miocene
Bessho Formation at Azumino City, Nagano Prefecture,
central Japan. Research Report of the Shinshushinmachi
Fossil Museum 12, 1–6.
JACKSON, T. A. 1980. The composition and differentiation of
the volcanic rocks of Carriacou, the Grenadines, West
Indies. Bulletin Volcanologique 43, 311–24.
JACKSON, T. A., SCOTT, P. W., DONOVAN, S. K., PICKERILL,
R. K., PORTELL, R. W. & HARPER, D. A. T. 2008. The
volcaniclastic turbidites of the Grand Bay Formation,
Carriacou, Grenadines, Lesser Antilles. Caribbean
Journal of Science 44, 116–24.
JONES, D. S. & PORTELL, R. W. 1988. Occurrence and
biogeographic significance of Heliaster (Echinoder-
mata: Asteroidea) from the Pliocene of southwest
Florida. Journal of Paleontology 62, 126–32.
JUNG, P. 1971. Fossil mollusks from Carriacou, West Indies.
Bulletins of American Paleontology 61 (269), 147–262.
KOEHLER, R. 1900. Note préliminaire sur les E˙chinides et les
Ophiures de l’Expédition Antarctique Belge. Bulletin de
l’Académie Royale de Belgique 11, 814–20.
KOEHLER, R. 1906. Ophiures. Expéditions Scientifiques du
Travailleur et du Talisman 8, 245–311.
KOEHLER, R. 1922. Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea. Aus-
tralasian Antarctic Expedition 1911–1914. Scientific
Report Series C 8, 5–98. Government Printing Office,
Sydney.
KOEHLER, R. 1930. Ophiures recueillies par le Docteur Th.
Mortensen dans les Mers d’Australie et dans l’Archipel
Malais. Papers from Dr Th. Mortensen’s Pacific Ex-
pedition 1914–16. LIV. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra
Dansk naturhistorisk Forening 89, 1–295.
LJUNGMAN, A. V. 1867. Ophiuroidea viventia huc usque
cognita enumerat. Ofversigt af Kongliga Vetenskap-
Akademiens Förhandlingar Stockholm 1866, 303–36.
LORIOL, P. DE. 1872. Description géologique et paléonto-
logique des étages jurassiques supérieurs de la Haute-
Marne. Mémoires de la Société linnéenne de Normandie
16, 1–542.
LYMAN, T. 1878. Ophiurans. Reports on the dredging
operations of the US coast survey Str. “Blake”. Bulletin
of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 5, 217–38.
LYMAN, T. 1883. Reports on the results of dredging, under the
supervision ofAlexander Agassiz, in the Carribbean Sea
(1878–79), and on the east coast of the United States,
during the summer of 1880, by the U.S. coast survey
steamer “Blake”, commander J.R. Bartlett, U.S.N.,
commanding. XX. Report on the Ophiuroidea. Bulletin
of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard
College 10, 227–87.
MARTYNOV, A.V. & LITVINOVA, N.M. 2008. Deep-water
Ophiuroidea of the northern Atlantic with descriptions
of three new species and taxonomic remarks on certain
genera and species.Marine Biology Research 4, 76–111.
MENZIES, R. J., GEORGE, R.Y. & ROWE, G.T. 1973. Abyssal
Environment and Ecology of the World Oceans. Wiley-
Interscience, New York, 488 pp.
MÜLLER, J. & TROSCHEL, F. H. 1840. System der Asteriden.
Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig, xx+134 pp.
OJI, T. 2001 Deep-sea communities. In Palaeobiology II (eds
D. E. G. Briggs & P. R. Crowther), pp. 444–7. Blackwell
Science, Oxford.
ORBIGNY, A. D. D’. 1850. Prodrome du Paléontologie
Stratigraphique Universelle des Animaux Mollusques
et Rayonnés Faisant suite au cours Élémentaire de
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 01 Mar 2016 IP address: 134.76.162.165
Starfish bed in Middle Miocene Grand Bay Formation of Carriacou 393
Paléontologie et de Géologie Stratigraphique. 2, Mas-
son, Paris, 428 pp.
OYEN, C. W. & PORTELL, R. W. 2001. Diversity patterns
and biostratigraphy of Cenozoic echinoderms from
Florida. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoe-
cology 166, 193–218.
PERRIER, E. 1881. Description sommaire des espèces
nouvelles d’Astéries. Bulletin of the Museum of Com-
parative Zoology at Harvard University 9, 1–31.
PERRIER, E. 1884. Mémoire sur les étoiles de mer recueillis
dans la Mer des Antilles et la Golfe de Mexique.
Nouvelles Archives du Muséum National d’Histoire
Naturelle de Paris 6, 127–276.
PICKERILL, R. K., DONOVAN, S. K. & DUNN, J.T. 1995.
Enigmatic cobbles and boulders in the Paleogene
Richmond Formation of eastern Jamaica. Caribbean
Journal of Science 31, 185–99.
SÁNCHEZ ROIG, M. 1949. Contribución a la paleontología
Cubana. Los equinodermos fósiles de Cuba. Paleonto-
logia Cubana 1, 1–302.
SLADEN, W.P. 1885. Asteroidea. In Report on the Scientific
Results of the Voyage of the Challenger, Narrative 1(2)
(eds C. Wyville Thomson & J. Murray), 607–17. Her
Majesty’s Stationary Office, London.
SLADEN, W.P. 1889. The Asteroidea. Report on the Scientific
Results of the Voyage of the Challenger, Zoology 30,
1–935.
SPEED, R. C., SMITH–HOROWITZ, P. L., PERCH–NIELSEN,
K V. S., SAUNDERS, J. B. & SANFILIPPO, A. B.
1993. Southern Lesser Antilles Arc Platform: pre–late
Miocene stratigraphy, structure, and tectonic evolution.
Geological Society of America Special Paper 277,
98 pp.
SPENCER, W. K. & WRIGHT, C. W. 1966. Asterozoans.
In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part U,
Echinodermata 3(1) (ed. R. C. Moore), U4-U107. New
York and Lawrence: The Geological Society of America
and The University of Kansas Press.
THUY, B. & STÖHR, S. 2011. Lateral arm plate morphology
in brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea): new
perspectives for ophiuroid micropalaeontology and
classification. Zootaxa 3013, 1–47.
VALETTE, A. 1926. Nota sobre dos asteroideos nuevos de la
isla de Cuba. 23–26. In Contribución a la paleontología
Cubana. Los equinodermos fósiles de Cuba (M. Sánchez
Roig). Boletin de Minas 10, 179+v pp.
VÉLEZ-JUARBE, J. & SANTOS, H. 2008. Fossil Echinodermata
from Puerto Rico. In Echinoderm Paleobiology (eds
W. I. Ausich & G. D. Webster), 368–95. Indiana
University Press, Bloomington.
VERRILL, A.E. 1899. Report on the Ophiuroidea collected
by the Bahama expedition in 1893. Bulletin from the
Laboratories of Natural History of the State University
of Iowa 5, 1–86.