Comment on ‘Kidron, G. J. (2018). Biocrust research: A critical view on eight common hydrological-related paradigms and dubious theses. Ecohydrology, e2061’

Felde, Vincent John Martin Noah Linus ORCIDiD
Rodriguez-Caballero, Emilio ORCIDiD
Chamizo, Sonia ORCIDiD
Rossi, Federico ORCIDiD
Uteau, Daniel ORCIDiD
Peth, Stephan ORCIDiD
Keck, Hannes ORCIDiD
De Philippis, Roberto ORCIDiD
Belnap, Jayne ORCIDiD
Eldridge, David J. ORCIDiD

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2215
Persistent URL: http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gldocs-11858/9510
Felde, Vincent John Martin Noah Linus; Rodriguez-Caballero, Emilio; Chamizo, Sonia; Rossi, Federico; Uteau, Daniel; Peth, Stephan; Keck, Hannes; De Philippis, Roberto; Belnap, Jayne; Eldridge, David J., 2020: Comment on ‘Kidron, G. J. (2018). Biocrust research: A critical view on eight common hydrological-related paradigms and dubious theses. Ecohydrology, e2061’. In: Ecohydrology, 13, 6, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2215. 

Files

ECO_ECO2215.pdf (197.18 KB)

Abstract

According this discussion the eight putative paradigms advanced by Kidron (2018) cannot be upheld nor are they commonly held among hydrologists, ecologists, or microbiologists that investigate biocrusts.

Subjects
biocrust research
comment

Collections

Paläontologie, Geobiologie