Geochronology and petrogenesis of granitoids and associated mafic enclaves from Ghohroud in the Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (Iran): Evidence for magma mixing during the closure of the Neotethyan Ocean

Khaksar, Tayebeh
Rashidnejad‐Omran, Nematollah ORCIDiD
Li, Shuang‐Qing ORCIDiD
Song, Shu‐Guang ORCIDiD
Kananian, Ali ORCIDiD
Chen, Fukun
Li, Su

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.4480
Persistent URL: http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gldocs-11858/10166
Khaksar, Tayebeh; Rashidnejad‐Omran, Nematollah; Li, Shuang‐Qing; Song, Shu‐Guang; Kananian, Ali; Chen, Fukun; Li, Su, 2022: Geochronology and petrogenesis of granitoids and associated mafic enclaves from Ghohroud in the Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (Iran): Evidence for magma mixing during the closure of the Neotethyan Ocean. In: Geological Journal, 57, 8, 3313-3332, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.4480. 
 
Khaksar, Tayebeh; 1 Department of Geology, Faculty of Basic Sciences Tarbiat Modares University Tehran Iran
Rashidnejad‐Omran, Nematollah; 1 Department of Geology, Faculty of Basic Sciences Tarbiat Modares University Tehran Iran
Song, Shu‐Guang; 3 Department of Geology School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University Beijing China
Kananian, Ali; 4 School of Geology College of Science, University of Tehran Tehran Iran
Chen, Fukun; 5 Department of Geochemistry and Environmental sciences School of Earth and Space Sciences University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China
Li, Su; 6 State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources Institute of Earth Science, Chinese University of Geosciences Beijing China

Abstract

The Ghohroud granitoids (GG), containing mafic microgranular enclaves (MMEs) are located in the central part of the Urumieh‐Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (UDMA) in central Iran. They are associated with the subduction‐related magmatism in the Alpine‐Himalayan orogenic belt. The GG are comprised of a variety of intermediate and felsic rocks, including tonalite, granodiorite, granite, diorite porphyry and monzodiorite. The MMEs are gabbroic diorite and tonalite in composition and characterized by a fine‐grained hypidiomorphic microgranular texture with occasional chilled margins. They show rounded, sharp or irregular contact with the host granitoids. The occurrences of quartz, K‐feldspar and corroded plagioclase indicate that MMEs are the products of mixing between mantle and crust‐derived magmas. New ages of zircon U–Pb dating reveal that the GG in the Kashan area emplaced at ca. 19–17 Ma (Burdigalian). All the samples of MMEs and granitoid host rocks in this study are metaluminous and calc‐alkaline with I‐type affinities. They are enriched in light rare earth elements (LREEs) and show slight negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.36–0.95). These features in a combination with the relative depletion in Nb, Ta, Ti and P, indicate the granitoids and MMEs are closely associated with subduction‐related magmas at an active continental margin. The host rocks yield relatively homogeneous isotopic compositions of initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios ranging from 0.706036 to 0.707055, εNd(t) values varying from −2.25 to 0.8, and the Nd model ages (TDM) vary in a limited range of 0.70–0.96 Ga. The MMEs show similar initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.706420–0.707366), εNd(t) values (−1.32 to −0.27), TDM (0.68–1.09 Ga) and Pb isotopic compositions with host granitoids, which imply they attained isotopic equilibration during magma mingling and mixing. In combination with the petrographic, chemical and isotopic results, we suggest that the origin of MMEs and their host rocks were related to the interaction between crust‐derived melts and mantle‐derived mafic magmas. The magma‐mixing event possibly occurred during the transition from subduction to collision in the UDMA along with the closure of the Neotethyan ocean.


A comprehensive dataset from petrographic characteristics to geochemical compositions of the mafic microgranular enclaves and granitoid host rocks from the Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (Iran) was presented. The new data provide significant insight into the evolution of magmatism in this area, which was tightly related to the Neotethyan closure.

image