The statistics displayed are generated by the underlying DSpace-System of GEO-LEOe-docs. Therefore they neither follow standards such as COUNTER nor are they cleaned from automated machine access (e.g. by crawlers). For more information click here.

Total Visits

Views
Comparative Evaluation of Different MOF and Non‐MOF Porous Materials for SO2 Adsorption and Separation Showing the Importance of Small Pore Diameters for Low‐Pressure Uptake85

Total Visits Per Month

March 2022April 2022May 2022June 2022July 2022August 2022September 2022
Comparative Evaluation of Different MOF and Non‐MOF Porous Materials for SO2 Adsorption and Separation Showing the Importance of Small Pore Diameters for Low‐Pressure Uptake377511164

File Visits

Views
ADSU_ADSU202000285.pdf55

Top country views

Views
United States49
Germany14
Netherlands9
Sweden6
France4
Belgium1
United Kingdom1

Top cities views

Views
Ashburn16
Los Angeles10
Naaldwijk9
Redwood City4
Strasbourg4
Fairfield3
Höst3
Leipzig3
Göttingen2
San Francisco2