GEO-LEOedocs LogoGEO-LEOedocs Logo
  • GEO-LEO
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • GEO-LEO
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Alle Publikationen
  • Montanwesen, Energie, Ressourcen, Umwelt
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Alle Publikationen
  • Montanwesen, Energie, Ressourcen, Umwelt
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Non‐ and sub‐state climate action after Paris: From a facilitative regime to a contested governance landscape

Marquardt, JensORCIDiD
Fast, CorneliaORCIDiD
Grimm, JuliaORCIDiD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.791
Persistent URL: http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gldocs-11858/10384
Marquardt, Jens; Fast, Cornelia; Grimm, Julia, 2022: Non‐ and sub‐state climate action after Paris: From a facilitative regime to a contested governance landscape. In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Band 13, 5, DOI: 10.1002/wcc.791.
 
Thumbnail
View/Open
WCC_WCC791.pdf (3.718Mb)
Metadata Export:
Endnote
BibTex
RIS
  • Abstract
The Paris Agreement marks a significant milestone in international climate politics. With its adoption, Parties call for non‐ and sub‐state actors to contribute to the global climate agenda and close the emissions gap left by states. Such a facilitative setting embraces non‐state climate action through joint efforts, synergies, and different modes of collaboration. At the same time, non‐state actors have always played a critical and confrontational role in international climate governance. Based on a systematic literature review, we identify and critically assess the role of non‐state climate action in a facilitative post‐Paris climate governance regime. We thereby highlight three constitutive themes, namely different state‐non‐state relations, competing level of ambition, and a variety of knowledge foundations. We substantiate these themes, derived from an inductive analysis of existing literature, with illustrative examples and propose three paradigmatic non‐state actor roles in post‐Paris climate governance on a continuum between compliance and critique. We thereby highlight four particular threats of a facilitative setting, namely substitution of state action, co‐optation, tokenism, and depoliticization. Future research should not limit itself to an effective integration of NSSAs into a facilitative climate regime, but also engage with the merits of contestation. This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance
 
Three constitutive themes—different state‐non‐state relations, levels of ambition, and knowledge foundations—define the multiple roles non‐ and sub‐state actors can occupy in the post‐Paris climate governance regime. Yet, calls for voluntary, collaborative, and synergetic non‐state climate action in a facilitative post‐Paris climate governance setting run the risk to overshadow fundamental tensions when governing climate change.
Statistik:
View Statistics
Collection
  • Montanwesen, Energie, Ressourcen, Umwelt [208]
Subjects:
climate change governance
contestation
environmental politics
non‐state actors
Paris Agreement
transformation
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ImpressumPrivacy (Opt-Out)Cookie ConsentsAbout us/ContactDeposit LicenseSubmission hintsSupport: fid-geo-digi@sub.uni-goettingen.de
DFGSUBFID GEOFID Montan
 

 

Submit here
Submission hints
Search hints

All of Geo-Leo e-docsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateContributorsSubjectsPeriodicalsTitlesThis CollectionBy Issue DateContributorsSubjectsPeriodicalsTitles

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

ImpressumPrivacy (Opt-Out)Cookie ConsentsAbout us/ContactDeposit LicenseSubmission hintsSupport: fid-geo-digi@sub.uni-goettingen.de
DFGSUBFID GEOFID Montan