GEO-LEOedocs LogoGEO-LEOedocs Logo
  • GEO-LEO
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • GEO-LEO
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Alle Publikationen
  • Geochemie, Mineralogie, Petrologie
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Alle Publikationen
  • Geochemie, Mineralogie, Petrologie
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Could oxalate-extractable phosphorus replace phosphorus fractionation schemes in soil phosphorus prospections?—A case study in the prehistoric Milseburg hillfort (Germany)

Weihrauch, ChristophORCIDiD
Schupp, Alexander
Söder, Ulrike
Opp, Christian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21760
Persistent URL: http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gldocs-11858/9283
Weihrauch, Christoph; Schupp, Alexander; Söder, Ulrike; Opp, Christian, 2019: Could oxalate-extractable phosphorus replace phosphorus fractionation schemes in soil phosphorus prospections?—A case study in the prehistoric Milseburg hillfort (Germany). In: Geoarchaeology, Band 35, 1: 98 - 111, DOI: 10.1002/gea.21760.
 
Thumbnail
View/Open
GEA_GEA21760.pdf (3.028Mb)
Metadata Export:
Endnote
BibTex
RIS
  • Abstract
A geoarchaeological soil phosphorus (P) prospection is used to identify a gate within the prehistoric rampart of the Milseburg hillfort (Hesse, Germany). This study compares the application of a P fractionation scheme and P extraction with ammonium-oxalate. We hypothesized that oxalate-extractable P (P-ox) and the related degree of P saturation (DPS) could replace the more expensive and time-consuming fractionation schemes for geoarchaeological investigations. Comparing the results, the P fractionation helped to verify the existence of another section of the prehistoric ramparts and to identify the location of a gate within it. It also helped to discover the archaeologically relevant soil depths in the investigated area. This information could not be retrieved from the P-ox data alone. Soil P-ox contents and DPS values are relatively unspecific with regard to prehistoric land use. However, DPS at least indicates settled versus unsettled areas. Still, the results of the P fractionation more clearly delineate Iron Age land use areas including settlement, non-settlement, rampart, and rampart gap (probable gate). Thus, in geoarchaeological contexts, this method seems to be preferable to a singular P-ox extraction. However, for better results, P-ox determination could be integrated into a P fractionation scheme.
Statistik:
View Statistics
Collection
  • Geochemie, Mineralogie, Petrologie [395]
Subjects:
Milseburg
oxalate-extractable phosphorus
phosphorus fractionation
phosphorus saturation
soil phosphorus prospection
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ImpressumPrivacy (Opt-Out)Cookie ConsentsAbout us/ContactDeposit LicenseSubmission hintsSupport: fid-geo-digi@sub.uni-goettingen.de
DFGSUBFID GEOFID Montan
 

 

Submit here
Submission hints
Search hints

All of Geo-Leo e-docsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateContributorsSubjectsPeriodicalsTitlesThis CollectionBy Issue DateContributorsSubjectsPeriodicalsTitles

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

ImpressumPrivacy (Opt-Out)Cookie ConsentsAbout us/ContactDeposit LicenseSubmission hintsSupport: fid-geo-digi@sub.uni-goettingen.de
DFGSUBFID GEOFID Montan